process
things

reblogged from  
auwa:


dickbipch:

stfuconservatives:

ethiopienne:

deliciouskaek:

14kgoldnyc:

sanityscraps:

goldenheartedrose:

soultired:

goldenheartedrose:

inflateablefilth:

nothingaboutus-withoutus:

artemispotter:

Leviticus 20:13:

If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

Nice try, Colbert.

Leviticus was written approximately 1400 years before Jesus’ birth.
Nice try, artemispotter.

Old Testament =/= New Testament. Seriously. Also, Leviticus also commands you to learn the Torah, which, if you’re getting Old and New confused, you clearly haven’t.

Not to mention the other ridiculous laws in Leviticus (and Deuteronomy, as well), including the following:
No mixing of different types of fabric
No having sex with a woman on her period
Curse your mother or father? You must be killed
Disabled people cannot worship God
Stubborn children should be stoned.
So…. still want to argue how valid the OT is?

Also, in the Bible!=Jesus said it, anyway. Even in the NT, there are a lot of people who aren’t Jesus giving their opinions.

Truth.
Only if the words are in red (in many translations) does it mean that Jesus said it.
FWIW, the apostle Paul and I would not have been friends. Mortal enemies is more like it.

Hey, guys, remember that one time when Jesus declared Levitican law irrelevant?

The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless(for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.
-Hebrews 7:18-19.


Having been Jewish for, you know, ever, I am endlessly amused at the Christian Right’s reliance on Leviticus. Even I, who didn’t understand the theological difference between Catholics and Protestants until I took a course on Christianity in college, knew that Jesus was totes anti-Leviticus.
Seriously, people…

^^^^^^^

Ugh thank you. Fellow Christian here. I’ve literally NEVER understood this logic. “hey guys let’s pick one arbitrary part of leviticus to harp on and ignore the fact that 99% of the new testament explicitly tells us the old covenants/laws no longer hold true”

I love it when self-professed “Christians” don’t know the ABSOLUTELY MOST SIMPLE basics of the difference between the Old and New Testament. If you are against gay marriage because of Leviticus, you should also keep kosher and be against tattoos. Otherwise you’re just another FLAMING HYPOCRITE.
-Jess

Stupid niggas that don’t read the bible or actually know what it means:
OP

yyyyyep


Behold. Logic. auwa:


dickbipch:

stfuconservatives:

ethiopienne:

deliciouskaek:

14kgoldnyc:

sanityscraps:

goldenheartedrose:

soultired:

goldenheartedrose:

inflateablefilth:

nothingaboutus-withoutus:

artemispotter:

Leviticus 20:13:

If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

Nice try, Colbert.

Leviticus was written approximately 1400 years before Jesus’ birth.
Nice try, artemispotter.

Old Testament =/= New Testament. Seriously. Also, Leviticus also commands you to learn the Torah, which, if you’re getting Old and New confused, you clearly haven’t.

Not to mention the other ridiculous laws in Leviticus (and Deuteronomy, as well), including the following:
No mixing of different types of fabric
No having sex with a woman on her period
Curse your mother or father? You must be killed
Disabled people cannot worship God
Stubborn children should be stoned.
So…. still want to argue how valid the OT is?

Also, in the Bible!=Jesus said it, anyway. Even in the NT, there are a lot of people who aren’t Jesus giving their opinions.

Truth.
Only if the words are in red (in many translations) does it mean that Jesus said it.
FWIW, the apostle Paul and I would not have been friends. Mortal enemies is more like it.

Hey, guys, remember that one time when Jesus declared Levitican law irrelevant?

The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless(for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.
-Hebrews 7:18-19.


Having been Jewish for, you know, ever, I am endlessly amused at the Christian Right’s reliance on Leviticus. Even I, who didn’t understand the theological difference between Catholics and Protestants until I took a course on Christianity in college, knew that Jesus was totes anti-Leviticus.
Seriously, people…

^^^^^^^

Ugh thank you. Fellow Christian here. I’ve literally NEVER understood this logic. “hey guys let’s pick one arbitrary part of leviticus to harp on and ignore the fact that 99% of the new testament explicitly tells us the old covenants/laws no longer hold true”

I love it when self-professed “Christians” don’t know the ABSOLUTELY MOST SIMPLE basics of the difference between the Old and New Testament. If you are against gay marriage because of Leviticus, you should also keep kosher and be against tattoos. Otherwise you’re just another FLAMING HYPOCRITE.
-Jess

Stupid niggas that don’t read the bible or actually know what it means:
OP

yyyyyep


Behold. Logic.

auwa:

dickbipch:

stfuconservatives:

ethiopienne:

deliciouskaek:

14kgoldnyc:

sanityscraps:

goldenheartedrose:

soultired:

goldenheartedrose:

inflateablefilth:

nothingaboutus-withoutus:

artemispotter:

Leviticus 20:13:

If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

Nice try, Colbert.

Leviticus was written approximately 1400 years before Jesus’ birth.

Nice try, artemispotter.

Old Testament =/= New Testament. Seriously. Also, Leviticus also commands you to learn the Torah, which, if you’re getting Old and New confused, you clearly haven’t.

Not to mention the other ridiculous laws in Leviticus (and Deuteronomy, as well), including the following:

  • No mixing of different types of fabric
  • No having sex with a woman on her period
  • Curse your mother or father? You must be killed
  • Disabled people cannot worship God
  • Stubborn children should be stoned.

So…. still want to argue how valid the OT is?

Also, in the Bible!=Jesus said it, anyway. Even in the NT, there are a lot of people who aren’t Jesus giving their opinions.

Truth.

Only if the words are in red (in many translations) does it mean that Jesus said it.

FWIW, the apostle Paul and I would not have been friends. Mortal enemies is more like it.

Hey, guys, remember that one time when Jesus declared Levitican law irrelevant?

The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless(for the law made nothing perfect), and a better hope is introduced, by which we draw near to God.

-Hebrews 7:18-19.

Having been Jewish for, you know, ever, I am endlessly amused at the Christian Right’s reliance on Leviticus. Even I, who didn’t understand the theological difference between Catholics and Protestants until I took a course on Christianity in college, knew that Jesus was totes anti-Leviticus.

Seriously, people…

^^^^^^^

Ugh thank you. Fellow Christian here. I’ve literally NEVER understood this logic. “hey guys let’s pick one arbitrary part of leviticus to harp on and ignore the fact that 99% of the new testament explicitly tells us the old covenants/laws no longer hold true”

I love it when self-professed “Christians” don’t know the ABSOLUTELY MOST SIMPLE basics of the difference between the Old and New Testament. If you are against gay marriage because of Leviticus, you should also keep kosher and be against tattoos. Otherwise you’re just another FLAMING HYPOCRITE.

-Jess

Stupid niggas that don’t read the bible or actually know what it means:

OP

yyyyyep

Behold. Logic.

(Source: drunkonstephen)

posted on May 12, 2012 at 7:49 AM

551,518 notes

  1. derekhaleisagryffindor reblogged this from lowlifetheory
  2. hellofahale reblogged this from lowlifetheory
  3. blue-eyed-baekhyun reblogged this from lowlifetheory
  4. cant-even-throw-straight reblogged this from hottiebots
  5. selfishslytherin reblogged this from chesapeakebae
  6. grpunk reblogged this from lowlifetheory
  7. mnemmy reblogged this from lowlifetheory
  8. starkspangledcaptain reblogged this from bradleysbumm
  9. lowlifetheory reblogged this from countdown1144
  10. bradleysbumm reblogged this from hannijar
  11. countdown1144 reblogged this from chesapeakebae
  12. chesapeakebae reblogged this from mypastwillnotbemyfuture
  13. earthy-artist reblogged this from blindskywatcher
  14. nondifferentiable reblogged this from luckystr1kesandtallthings
  15. akujinjoutei reblogged this from deeptreble
  16. mintartist reblogged this from sassy-mikasa-ackerman
  17. ceaselessinsanity reblogged this from blue-eyed-hanji
  18. hannijar reblogged this from zannablack
  19. deeptreble reblogged this from luckystr1kesandtallthings
  20. les-bi-honest-22 reblogged this from freskosworld
  21. shylittledame reblogged this from jaredpadalicker
  22. sinners-like-me666 reblogged this from i-am-rough-around-the-edges
  23. bigeeklyanxiety reblogged this from novangla and added:
    Oh my goodness, thank you!! Like I said, I’ve recently been trying to research the whole topic because of being bi and...
  24. whenmattattacks reblogged this from corrupted-state-of-mind
  25. novangla reblogged this from bigeeklyanxiety and added:
    oh gosh I’m so glad!! Also I would commend to you the blog of my friend anachronizomai, because she is aces at that sort...
  26. i-am-rough-around-the-edges reblogged this from luckystr1kesandtallthings
  27. luckystr1kesandtallthings reblogged this from mcmbr
  28. queen-of-ice-olation reblogged this from kissdeanwinchester
  29. phantastilistic reblogged this from cahlecanfly
  30. butterfly467 reblogged this from jaredpadalicker
  31. jaredpadalicker reblogged this from arumifurukawa
  32. gabbygolucky reblogged this from grumpiplier
  33. captaindeloons reblogged this from ironandgrapejuice